The Enscribe homepage has been redesigned. The new layout uses three feature cards for clearer navigation, and the search now resolves ENS names in your browser before making any backend calls.
As Enscribe added the new feature Batch Naming, the text-heavy homepage made it hard for new users to find what they needed.
The search bar also created unnecessary load. Users would search for an ENS name, navigate to a details page, and only then discover the name didn't resolve or pointed somewhere unexpected or they were on the wrong chain. This meant:
Enscribe has shipped Contract Batch Naming feature for our Enscribe UI app. Teams and projects can now name multiple smart contracts at once under a single parent domain. This reduces the contract naming process for projects with multiple deployed contracts from hours to minutes.
Managing multiple smart contracts across different chains has always been a challenge and time-consuming. Whether you're a DAO with governance contracts, a DeFi with multiple vault, protocol, core and utility contracts, or an infrastructure project with contracts deployed across chains, naming each contract individually means repeating the same steps: creating subnames, setting forward resolutions, and setting reverse resolutions. Each step costs gas.
When we worked with Nouns DAO to name their contracts, we saw this problem firsthand. They had to create subnames, set forward resolutions, and set reverse resolutions for each contract as a new step and their governance only allows maximum 10 transaction in a single proposal. This was their first proposal: ENS x Nouns, Name our Smart Contracts which didn't get through because of this issue.
Thus we built the Enscribe V2 contract to support batch naming with multi-chain support. This contract is now live on Ethereum mainnet and Sepolia testnet. You can read more about it in this blog post. Using the Enscribe V2 contract, you can name multiple contracts in one transaction.
We are now adding this batch naming feature support to our Enscribe UI app.
Batch naming uses the Enscribe V2 contract's setNameBatch() function. This involves a single transaction for creating subnames under the same parent domain and setting forward resolutions for all contracts at once. For example, if you're naming 10 contracts under myproject.eth, you just need one transaction to create 10 subnames and forward resolutions for all 10 contracts.
But for setting primary names, you need to execute one transaction for each compatible contract (contracts that are ownable/ERC-173 compliant) to set reverse resolution. Here's what happens under the hood:
Operator Access: First, Enscribe requests operator approval for your parent ENS domain. This is a one-time permission that allows the Enscribe contract to create subnames under your domain.
Batch Creation: All contract addresses and their corresponding names are sent in a single transaction to the Enscribe V2 contract. This creates subnames and sets forward resolutions for all contracts at once.
Reverse Resolution (L1): For contracts which are ownable/ERC-173 compliant and owned by your wallet, Enscribe sets up reverse resolution on Ethereum mainnet (or testnet), enabling address-to-name lookups.
L2 Primary Names: If you've selected L2 chains, Enscribe automatically switches to each chain and sets up primary names for the contracts there, ensuring consistent naming across all networks.
Operator Revocation: Finally, operator access is revoked, returning full control of your ENS domain to you.
All of this happens in one modal flow, with clear progress indicators for each step.
Batch naming supports automatic parent subdomain creation. If you're naming contracts hierarchically (e.g., vault1.defi.myproject.eth, vault2.defi.myproject.eth), Enscribe automatically creates the intermediate parent (defi.myproject.eth) with no forward resolution. This keeps your namespace organized.
Note that each new level of parent subdomain requires a new batch naming transaction. For example, if you're naming three contracts under myproject.eth (app1.myproject.eth, app2.myproject.eth, app3.myproject.eth) and two more contracts under defi.myproject.eth (vault1.defi.myproject.eth, vault2.defi.myproject.eth), you need two separate batch naming transactions:
First transaction: app1.myproject.eth, app2.myproject.eth, app3.myproject.eth, defi.myproject.eth
Second transaction: vault1.defi.myproject.eth, vault2.defi.myproject.eth
Step-by-Step Guide: Batch Naming Your Contractsβ
Let's walk through naming multiple contracts using batch naming.
Select the parent ENS domain under which all your contracts will be named. You can use:
Your project's ENS domain (e.g., myproject.eth)
The default Enscribe parent (deployd.eth)
Operator Access
Batch naming requires operator access to create subnames. An info tooltip explains this next to the Parent Domain field. Don't worryβaccess is revoked after naming completes or else it can be revoked manually anytime.
Batch naming is more gas-efficient than individual naming, but naming many contracts still requires significant gas. The transaction cost will depend on:
Number of contracts in the batch
Number of L2 chains selected
Maximum recommended batch size: 50 contracts (gas limits may reach for larger batches)
Ready to name multiple contracts? Visit app.enscribe.xyz, connect your wallet to Ethereum mainnet or Sepolia, navigate to "Batch Naming", and start naming.
We'd love to hear about your batch naming experience:
Enscribe is now available as a native Safe app. You can add Enscribe directly to your Safe environment and name contracts using your multisig wallet without leaving the Safe interface.
This update makes it easier for teams and DAOs to manage contract naming through their existing Safe workflows.
If you manage contracts through a Safe multisig, you can now:
Name contracts directly from the Safe interface
Deploy new contracts with ENS names set using your Safe wallet
Queue naming transactions for other signers to review
Execute contract naming once your signing threshold is met
Keep all contract management in one place
Previously, connecting Enscribe to Safe required WalletConnect, which added friction to the process. With native Safe SDK integration, Enscribe works as a custom Safe app. Add it once, and it's available whenever you need it.
When you use Enscribe inside Safe, the contract naming process creates multiple transactions. These transactions are visible for you to review before signing, added to your Safe's transaction queue, shareable with other signers in your Safe, and executable by any signer once the signing threshold is reached. This workflow matches how Safe handles all multisig operations, making contract naming part of your standard governance process.
Once enough signers approve the transactions (based on your Safe's signing threshold), any signer can execute them. The contract naming completes when all transactions are confirmed onchain.
If you're naming multiple contracts, you can queue all the transactions before executing any of them. This gives your team time to review everything together.
Each contract naming operation creates its own set of transactions in the queue. Signers can approve them individually or in batches, depending on your workflow.
Once all the transactions are approved or signed by the required number of signers, you can execute them all at once in a batched transaction, this will save you gas and time.
Enscribe makes smart contracts easier to identify by giving them human-readable names. With native Safe support, teams can now manage contract naming through their existing multisig workflows.
If you have feedback or feature requests for the Safe app experience, reach out through our socials - X, Discord and Telegram
Enscribe V2 is now deployed on Ethereum mainnet. This upgrade brings batch operations, multi-chain support, and gas optimizations that make naming large numbers of contracts practical.
Projects deploying multiple smart contracts face a challenge: each contract needs a separate ENS transaction to get a human-readable name. For a project with 10, 20, or 100+ contracts, this means:
Dozens of individual transactions
High cumulative gas costs
Hours of manual execution
Complex workflow coordination
A DAO deploying governance contracts, treasury modules, and token contracts previously needed separate ENS transactions for each β monitoring every transaction and managing a complex deployment process.
address[]memory contracts =[ 0x1234...,// Active contract address(0),// Reserve "staging", 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 address 0x5678...// Active contract ]; enscribeV2.setNameBatch( contracts, ["prod","staging","analytics"], "myproject.eth" );
As demontrated in Batch Contract Naming section also, using address(0) creates the subname but skips forward resolution β useful for just creating the subname.
Projects can now:
Name dozens of contracts in one transaction
Save gas through batch operations and new gas optimizations
Enscribe makes smart contracts easier to trust by giving them human-readable names. Earlier this year, we proposed an ENSIP for contract metadata standards. V2's batch capabilities and multi-chain support lay the groundwork for that vision β making it practical for projects to build complete, discoverable contract identities.
Whether you're deploying a DeFi protocol, launching a DAO, or building any multi-contract system, Enscribe V2 helps you establish clear contract identity from day one.
As part of our mission to fix Ethereum UX, educating users on everything to do with naming smart contracts and ENS is a key part of this.
While we have a lot of technical documentation on our site, what's been missing is guides that tie together the content in an easy to follow manner. We're launching a new Guides section to help developers deploy and name smart contracts with Enscribe on L1 and L2 networks. Think of it as a hands-on companion to our technical documentation.
The Guides section focuses on practical tutorials you can follow along. While our documentation covers technical details, these guides walk you through real workflows step by step.
Smart contracts power the onchain economy, but they lack proper identity infrastructure. When users encounter a contract address like 0x742d35cc567890c000c000c07c81c25d7df34793, they can't easily verify what it does, who built it, or whether it's safe to use.
Enscribe has been working to solve this through contract naming. Now we're taking the next step by proposing a new ENS Improvement Proposal that establishes a comprehensive metadata standard for smart contracts.
Trust Issues: Users can't easily verify if a contract is legitimate or malicious
Missing Documentation: No standard way to find a contract's docs, source code, or audit reports
Inconsistent Information: Wallets and dApps show different (or no) contract details
Poor Developer Experience: No standard API for contract discovery and metadata
While ENS enables human-readable contract names, the ecosystem lacks standardized metadata storage. Projects create custom solutions, users rely on centralized services, and critical information gets scattered across different platforms.
We've submitted an ENSIP that extends ENSIP-5 (Text Records) with standardized metadata fields for smart contracts. This creates one source of truth for contract information, stored directly in ENS records.
Imagine if instead of simply seeing a hex contract address you had a rich view of the contract such as this:
Our proposed standard would serve as a foundation to make such information available for smart contracts across Ethereum.
The proposal introduces a new resolver profile for complete compiler-generated metadata. Building on ENSIP-4's (Support for contract ABIs) multi-encoding approach, it supports:
JSON formats: Uncompressed and compressed
CBOR encoding: For onchain parsing
URI storage: IPFS, Arweave for large files
This metadata contains everything needed for contract verification: ABI definitions, compiler settings, source code hashes, and NatSpec documentation.
We've implemented this metadata standard for our own contract as a demonstration. You can see v0.enscribe.named.eth on ENS Manager with all the proposed metadata fields populated (some values are placeholder for now).
Since the ENS manager app doesn't yet render contract metadata optimally (it's designed for user profiles), here's how we envision displaying contract metadata in applications built for contracts:
Current ENS Manager view - shows metadata but not optimized for contracts
The difference is clear: contract-specific interfaces can organize and display metadata in ways that help developers and users understand what they're interacting with.
Enscribe makes smart contracts easier to trust by giving them human-readable names. This ENSIP extends that mission β moving from basic naming to complete contract identity infrastructure.
The proposal includes technical specifications, implementation examples, and design rationale. Whether you build protocols, develop wallets, or use onchain applications, your input helps create better infrastructure.
Join the discussion and help us build standardized, discoverable contract identity for the onchain world. You can also share your thoughts, suggestions, and any issues you encounter through our Discord community, Telegram, or X.
L2 primary names solve a fundamental problem in the multi-chain Ethereum ecosystem. A single DApp can have different contract addresses across various Layer 2 networks, or sometimes the same address (often due to CREATE2 deployments). Without a standard way to name them, users and developers must manage a confusing list of addresses.
According to ENSIP-19, L2 primary names enable reverse and primary name resolution for all coin types across the multichain Ethereum ecosystem. This standardizes how ENS names resolve to different addresses based on the network, making the ecosystem more legible and trustworthy. This works regardless whether the contract's address is the same or different across networks.
This is possible through a coinType parameter in the ENS resolver function addr(bytes32 node, uint256 coinType), which specifies the network. A single ENS name like mycontract.eth can be configured to point to the correct contract address on each chain.
Enscribe supports L2 primary names across five Layer 2 networks:
Optimism (Mainnet & Sepolia)
Arbitrum (Mainnet & Sepolia)
Scroll (Mainnet & Sepolia)
Base (Mainnet & Sepolia)
Linea (Mainnet & Sepolia)
The feature works in two directions. Forward resolution means your ENS name resolves to the correct contract address on each L2. Reverse resolution means your contract address resolves back to your ENS name on each L2.
Example: If you set up myname.eth β 0x123... on Ethereum and Base:
Forward Resolution:
Ethereum: Coin type 60 (0x3c) - myname.eth resolves to 0x123...
Base: Coin type 2147483653 (0x80002105) - myname.eth resolves to 0x123...
Reverse Resolution:
Ethereum: 0x123...addr.reverse - resolves back to myname.eth
Base: 0x123...80014a34.reverse - resolves back to myname.eth
Note: L2 primary names for Linea and Base are different from currently supported .linea.eth and .base.eth names. L2 primary names work through ENSIP-19 coin types, while .linea.eth and .base.eth are separate ENS domains.
You must set up L2 primary names from an L1 chain (Ethereum mainnet or Sepolia). This process cannot be done by connecting directly to an L2 network.
The reason is that the core ENS infrastructure, which manage name registration and resolution rules, reside on L1. Key actions, like creating subnames and configuring them to point to different addresses on various L2sβmust be recorded on these foundational L1 contracts to ensure a single, authoritative source of truth.
Enscribe supports three main scenarios for setting up L2 primary names:
L1 + L2 Naming: Set primary names on both L1 and selected L2 chains when your contract has the same address across all networks
L2 Only Naming: Skip L1 naming and set primary names only on specific L2 chains
Multi-Address Naming: Use the same ENS name for different contract addresses on different L2 chains
Case 1: Same Contract Address Across All Chainsβ
This approach is for contracts that have the same address on different L2 chains. You can name this contract on all L2 chains together.
Connect to L1: Connect your wallet to Ethereum mainnet or Sepolia
Enter contract details:
Contract Address: Your contract's address on L1
Contract Name: Choose a name for your contract
ENS Parent: Select your preferred ENS parent domain
Select L2 chains: Click "Choose L2 Chains" and select which L2 networks you want to set up
Review steps: The system shows all steps that will execute:
Create subname on L1
Set forward resolution on L1
Set reverse resolution on L1 (if applicable)
Set forward resolution on each selected L2
Switch to each L2 and set primary name
Execute transactions: The modal guides you through each step, automatically switching chains
If you want to set up primary names only on specific L2 chains without L1 naming:
Follow steps 1-3 from Case 1
Enable "Skip L1 Naming" to skip L1 forward and reverse resolution
Submit to execute only L2-related steps
Case 3: Different Contract Addresses on Different L2 Chainsβ
If you deployed the same contract on different L2 chains but it has different contract addresses, you can use the same ENS name as the primary name for all chains.
Use the same name label and ENS parent, then:
Enter the first contract address and select its corresponding L2 chain
Enable "Skip L1 Naming" to focus only on L2 naming
Execute the naming process
Repeat for each different contract address on different L2 chains
Don't worry β it won't create a subname every time on L1. The subname creation happens only once, and subsequent operations just set up the L2 primary names.
Note: The default Enscribe parent domain, deployd.eth, is not yet compatible with L2 primary names. For now, please use your own ENS domain as the parent.
We will resolve this issue in our next release, which will involve redeploying the Enscribe contract.
Contract deployers get a unified identity for their contracts across all chains. Users can interact with your contract using the same name regardless of which chain they're on, eliminating the need to explain different addresses for the same contract.
Users benefit from simplified interactions β they can use the same ENS name to interact with contracts across chains. This reduces errors from sending transactions to wrong addresses and makes it easier to find and verify contract addresses.
The broader ecosystem sees improved interoperability as cross-chain contract interactions work smoothly. Enhanced security comes from reduced risk of address confusion, leading to a more intuitive multi-chain experience.
Ready to give your contracts a unified identity across the Ethereum ecosystem? Visit app.enscribe.xyz, connect your wallet to Ethereum mainnet or Sepolia, navigate to "Name Contract", enter your contract details, select your desired L2 chains, and execute the naming process.
We want to hear your experience with L2 primary names. Share your thoughts, suggestions, and any issues you encounter through our Discord community, Telegram, or Twitter/X.
L2 primary names help make the multi-chain Ethereum ecosystem more legible and trustworthy. We're excited to see how this feature helps developers and users navigate the onchain landscape more effectively.
At Enscribe, we're dedicated to improving the onchain experience for users. One part of this is by making smart contract addresses more human-readable and user-friendly by simplifying contract naming with ENS.
While making the experience more user-friendly, we also want to improve the UI/UX of the Enscribe platform. In line with this commitment, we're excited to announce a key enhancement: Enscribe now fully supports a dark mode theme!
You can find the theme toggle button in the top right corner of the Enscribe application. The white sun icon indicates the light theme, and the dark moon icon activates the new dark theme.
Every screen within Enscribe now adapts to dark mode, designed with carefully chosen color contrasts for optimal readability. This ensures a consistent and comfortable visual experience across the entire application, whether you're deploying a new contract or reviewing your existing ones.
Deploy a new smart contract with primary name
Name an existing smart contract
Transaction loading state
Successful contract naming modal
View account details along with Ethereum Follow Protocol card
Detailed contract information view
Browse your deployed named and unnamed contracts
We've ensured that key workflows, from deploying new contracts and naming existing ones to viewing your account details and managing your contracts, are all optimized for the new dark theme. The improved contrast aims to make your interactions with Enscribe smoother and less straining on the eyes.
We've updated Enscribe to make contract exploration clear and useful across multiple networks. This update focuses on direct sharing links, multi-chain support, and better ENS integration to help you identify and trust smart contracts.
The updated search bar lets you look up any Ethereum address or ENS name without connecting your wallet first. Just paste a 0x address or type an ENS name, and Enscribe immediately shows you the relevant details.
The search works with:
Standard Ethereum addresses (0x...)
ENS names
Automatic detection of which chain to use
The ENS resolution works correctly across different networks, using mainnet resolvers for production chains and Sepolia for test networks, then directing you to the right page based on chain context.
Our new Explore page serves as a central hub for getting ENS details for any address onchain. It detects whether you're looking at a smart contract or a regular account (EOA) and shows you specific information that matters for each type.
You can directly access any address using this URL format:
This standardized URL structure makes addresses easy to bookmark and share with others, allowing for collaborative exploration of the Ethereum ecosystem.
Primary ENS name (if available) with appropriate expiry status icon similar to contract view
All associated ENS names pointing to this address
ENS names owned or managed by this address with expiry information
Copy functionality for addresses and names
Both account and contract views include external links β addresses link to Etherscan while ENS names link to the ENS app. When you click on an ENS name that a contract or account owns, Enscribe resolves it to an address and opens that address in a new tab within Enscribe.
The ENS name resolution for owned names:
Opens resolved addresses in a new tab for convenient exploration
The chain selector helps you navigate between networks while examining an address. It sits at the top of the interface and changes how it works based on whether your wallet is connected.
When No Wallet is Connected:
Choose any supported chain from the dropdown
Switch networks to compare the same address across chains
All data loads specifically for the selected network
When a Wallet is Connected:
Chain selector automatically syncs with your connected wallet's network
When switching chains on wallet, you'll be redirected to view the same address on the newly selected chain
Base Sepolia - Partial support (working with ENS node Namehash team for full integration)
This design handles the specific requirements of each chain, including ENS resolution differences and verification source availability. When you switch chains, the URL updates with the new chain ID, creating direct links to the same address across different networks.
This update makes Enscribe a more useful tool for everyone who works with smart contracts. It creates clarity around contract identity and verification status across multiple networks.
We've rolled out a great new feature in Enscribe β the ability to easily choose your owned or managed ENS domains when deploying or naming smart contracts.
This makes it straightforward to find the right ENS parent name you want to name your contract with.
Thanks to the integration with ENS Subgraph , Enscribe can now fetch all ENS names that your connected wallet owns or manages and show them to you.
When a user connects their wallet, Enscribe queries the ENS subgraph and retrieves a complete list of ENS domains owned or managed by that wallet. These names are then:
Note: Support for Base Sepolia testnet is pending because no ENS subgraph exists yet. We're actively working with Namehash to add support β see GitHub issue #768.
Visit enscribe.xyz and try the new ENS parent selection workflow in both the Deploy and Name Contract flows.
Let us know what you think β your feedback helps us shape a smoother, safer, and more trusted smart contract experience.
We'd love to hear your feedback on this feature β join our Discord community or Telegram communities and letβs eliminate hex smart contract addresses for users.